|
Neutralizing the Effects of EMF Fields
by Leif Erlingsson 2008-03-05 Two days ago I saw a very interesting documentary, "Cell Phones: An Industry On Trial". From information mentioned there, I did some Internet research. And this is what I came up with: Well verified research results & invention that prevents EMF fields from having (also well verified) biological effects. The EMF BiochipTM Technology- Neutralizing the Effects of EMF Field Jan Klintestam J.P. Flosgaard Bak EMX-Corporation USA http://www.who.int/peh-emf/meetings/archive/en/paper13klintestam.pdf Some cut-pasted text from the link: The biological basis for the technology: Non-ionizing, non-thermal EMF field carrying a constant signal is capable in transmitting a message into the cellular system of animals and human beings. This signal is characterized as a warning message informing the cellular system about the EMF exposure, just as if it was exposed to a real threat such as potential damage due to ionizing radioactivity, x-ray, overheating, toxic chemicals, bacterial attacks etc. Despite the fact that the nonthermal EMF field lacks the energy and intensity to harm the cellular system directly, the response on the biological level to this false alarm is still triggered, which undesirably can exhaust the cell's defense system and makes it vulnerable to real attacks. However, a condition for triggering the cell's response is that the constancy of the EMF field is at least one second, as it takes that amount of time for the cellular system in humans and animals to respond to the exposures. Where the constancy of the EMF field exceeds one second, the EMF signal is able triggers the sensors in the cell membranes, and thereby transmit the warning message into the cellular system, triggering a cascade of events in the cellular biological system. Strong evidence for this sequence of events is provided by at least 50 studies showing that EMF exposure triggers the sensors at the cell membrane level. These studies are addressed in a 1996 paper, published by professor W.R. Adey and titled: "A growing scientific consensus on the cell and molecular biology mediating interactions with environmental electromagnetic fields". Furthermore research supporting the that EMF fields, by triggering the sensors in the cell membrane, actually can cause the activation of messenger enzymes like Tyrosine Kinase, has been published in different scientific papers, where the most important ones are three studies published by Loscher et al. in 1998, Harvey et al. in 1999, and Dibirdik et al in 1998. As demonstrated the responding sensors transmit the warning message through the messenger enzymes in the cell to the nucleus, which hereafter in self-defense activates a variety of biological effects in the cell metabolism, such as changes in the activities of the genes, hormones, enzymes and proteins, all putting the cell in a stress mode designed to protect the cell against interference from the environment. The leading studies confirming this are: Lin et al. 1995, 1997, Goodman et al. 1998 and Trosko et al. 2000. This mechanism is natures emergency procedure and should be beneficial or protective, which seems to be the case at shorter exposures. However, if the exposure is repetitive for a longer accumulating period, generally being the case at EMF exposure, it can establish an almost permanent red alert state, which can involve an exhaustion of the cellular repair system, a condition that in the end can suppress the production of the some of the most important repair enzymes and stress proteins and thereby downregulate their ability to function. This downregulation of the cellular repair system is a serious condition, as the cells continually need to maintain efficient repair of their different biomolecules (among them the DNA molecule) constantly being bombarded and damaged (unfolded) by free radicals and other reactive species. If the repair enzymes are stressed and thereby unable to repair (fold) the DNA molecules, the ultimate repair tool, the stress proteins, should be activated making the enzymes functional again. Yet, if the stress protein is exhausted too due to repetitive exposure to the EMF field, this process will not be activated and the molecules will remain unrepaired. In case of unrepaired DNA molecules, the dysfunctional molecule can either die or transform itself into an abnormal molecule with damaged chromosomes, a so called: micronuclei, in both cases constituting a possible health effects, such as Cancer, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. If the abnormalities appears in the brain, cancer is most likely to happen in the areas, where the cells have the ability to multiply whereas the areas where the cells cannot reproduce Alzheimer's disease is a possible effect. Several studies among them two studies done by the Catholic University demonstrate this downregulation as a consequence of repeated EMF exposure: DiCarlo et al., Bioelectromagnetics circulation, 1999, "Myocardial protections conferred by electromagnetic fields" and DiCarlo et al. Bioelectrochemistry, "Electromagnetic field-induced protection of chick embryos against hypoxia exhibits characteristics of temporal sensing". As shown nonionizing, nonthermal EMF Fields are not able to damage the cellular system directly due to lack of sufficient energy or intensity, but the self created stress mode (down regulation) creates the only risk involved in the exposure to these powerless EMF field. It is the response to the exposure inside the cell system itself, which causes the biological effects and not the exposure as such. However, because of the reaction mechanism in the cellular system, no matter the length of the exposure a certain constancy in the pattern of the field is still needed before the exposure of the sensors actually results in an effective message, detectable in a responsive form by the nucleus. The studies involved and general biological knowledge documents the fact, that it takes a second for the cellular defense system to respond to exposure from the surrounding environment. By cutting the exposure of the sensors into fragments of less than a second, the warning system is in consequence interrupted and the exposure is neutralized. The defence system is untouched and no biological effects can possible occur. This is exactly what the EMX Noise Field Technology does. EMX Technology in a nutshell: The EMX Noise Field is effectively cutting the EMF Field in fragments smaller than a second, which interrupts the membrane sensor's ability to send a responsive warning signal to the nucleus. By superimposing the EMX Noise Field on the bioeffective EMF field, the sensors detect only a randomized signal that is the sum of the two fields. This process results in the warning system being neutralized, the cell not responding and a consequent absence of biological effects. This is the basic principle of the EMX Technology. Since no health effects can occur without an initial biological change, the EMX Noise Field Technology effectively eliminates any health effects that might arise from exposure to regular EMF fields. END QUOTE. I found out about the above technology through a TV documentary by the name "Cell Phones: An Industry On Trial". Recommended Google: "Dr. George Carlo" "Cell Phones". One very interesting Google cache hit: http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache: uLWQAwFec44J:www.electrosensitivity.org.uk/danger%2520what%2520danger.htm +%22Dr.+George+Carlo%22+%22Cell+Phones%22+%22Santa+barbara%22 In the documentary, the "Bak"'s are mentioned. This gives: "J.P. Folsgaard Bak" "Ulla Bak" "Dr. Thomas Magnussen" "Theodore Litowitz" http://www.google.com/search?q=%22J.P.+Folsgaard+Bak%22+%22Ulla+Bak%22 +%22Dr.+Thomas+Magnussen%22+%22Theodore+Litowitz%22&filter=0 Gave: http://www.newswireless.net/index.cfm/article/3231 http://www.quicktopic.com/37/H/4bykxBTt2bgYL/p-1.-1 QUOTE Following our story about Exradia [http://www.newswireless.net/index.cfm/article/3211], the technology which "protects phone users from radiation," Henrik Eiriksson got in touch with the following comment - posted on our discussion board. Hi Mr. Kewney & all. James Fintain Lawler got the Exradia technology from a bunch of Danes and an Israeli scientist. The people behind EMX corporation, the original patent holders of the now Exradia "noise-field" technology are J.P. Folsgaard Bak, his wife Ulla Bak and scientist Dr. Thomas Magnussen. The inventor and original patent holder is Theodore Litowitz. Being half Danish myself, Ulla Bak contacted me last year because I'm active in the movement to stop electromagnetic pollution and I had helped with scientific info in a lawsuit against a UMTS provider. In that lawsuit I had, together with Dr. Gerard Hyland (the plaintiffs expert witness) provided evidence that turned out to verify the principle behind the EMX technology (ie: coherent pulsy signal = bioeffect and random noisy signal = not so severe bioeffect). The EMX people noticed this and got in touch. They sent me their entire scientific portfolio - a regular brick of a publication. It shows that the EMX noise-field principle has been verified to decrease the non-thermal bioeffects of mobile-phones, WiFi etc. by at least seven different independent research facilities. Every time it was found that superimposing a random noise field onto a mobile-phone signal decreased the stress reactions in cells exposed. So, I say the EMX Exradia stuff is pretty solid. I don't think it's a complete solution, but it's a start... Some older EMX stuff that explains the sci is available here [http://www.who.int/peh-emf/meetings/archive/en/paper13klintestam.pdf]. END QUOTE I have seen the name "Bak" before. Probably a relative to Ulla Bak (I think the above Bak's took their last name after Ulla's): Per Bak died in 2002. I found this: Per Bak -- theoretical physicist, discoverer of self-organized criticality. Professor Bak was trained as a condensed matter physicist, and is now internationally known for his studies of self-organizing criticality and a variety of applications of power laws. Author of How Nature Works, Dr. Bak had been based at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark. He was in transition to the Imperial College in London, England and on the faculty of the Santa Fe Institute. Sadly, Dr. Bak died in October, 2002 after a long illness. [187-143] "Self-organized criticality" -- what Per Bak discovered -- is an extremely interesting area with a STRONG tie-in to electromagnetic biological effects. Check out the end of this VERY long text: "Y-Bias and Angularity:© The Dynamics of Self-Organizing Criticality From the Zero Point to Infinity" by David G. Yurth and Donald Ayres. The text is 137 pages long. The medically interesting part is on pages 117-120. Per Bak is mentioned on page 16. This is from page 16 as I quoted it in a mail that I sent to friends 19 November 2007: "As Bak and his team constructed each sand pile, they realized that there comes a time when the sand pile can no longer be considered just a stack of single, unrelated grains. As the mound of sand reaches the point of criticality [that point at which the quantum I/ threshold has been breached and the power laws become operative], the sand pile becomes a single, integrated, self-organizing system. As soon as this happens, it is no longer possible to predict the magnitude, location or frequency of any single avalanche event within the system. As the experimental evidence shows, even if we simultaneously know everything there is to know about every single grain of sand comprising the pile, the nature of open, complex and self-organizing SOC systems is such that we cannot improve the consistency, accuracy or reliability of our predictions regarding its behaviors in any locale. In SOC systems as they operate in Nature, there is no linear, 1-to-1 relationship between events occurring in the past and those which are anticipated in the future. We can predict only what the power laws permit. The importance of this insight cannot be overstated. It means, among other things, that in spite of all the best technologies and instrumentation we will ever devise, we will never, under any circumstances, be able to reliably predict the magnitude, location or timing of any events which occur as part of any complex, open SOC system[50]. This includes earthquakes[51], solar flares, stock market behaviors, mass extinctions, meteor strikes, weather, geologic events or the behaviors of human interactions such as the Internet. If our way of thinking about the world we live is modified to comport with the way the cosmos really works, instead of the way the world is described by the Standard Model, our approach to exploring the mysteries of the cosmos must be altered in ways that are still largely unimaginable." I wrote this in Swedish in that 19 November 2007 mail: Please note, this applies also to the Internet and our activities here. If we are creative and just DO, we can make amazing difference. Everything ties together. In the 80's I read about the mathematician Kurt Gödel who showed that all formal systems powerful enough to be of practical use at the same time always can formulate a logical contradiction. He proved this mathematically. Thus the universe is not a predetermined clockwork where all can be predicted if one knows all the parts. This was in the 1930:s. Per Bak, Dr. Myron Evans, Dr. Lawrence Crowell, Tom Bearden, professor Ruggero Maria Santilli and many others have made groundbreaking discoveries about our reality. That in turn the authors of "Y-Bias and Angularity©", David G. Yurth and Donald Ayres, are building on. This whole branch of science is rejected -- nothing we are supposed to need to care about. But that 'supposed to' is, I feel, best ignored. :) What I want to mention is precisely the result that ALL SYSTEMS IN THE UNIVERSE ARE OPEN. Not closed/symmetrical/predictable. But precisely with INFINITE POTENTIAL FOR CHANGE. It is thus a hypnosis act of cosmic proportions, that we 'can't do anything'. That we 'can't do anything' is because we don't understand how the universe works. When we understand how it works, nothing can stop us. And I suppose that is the reason that there are so powerful forces trying to keep us in the dark... (And that ends stuff reorganized and translated from a mail I sent to some friends 19 November 2007.) LINKS TO Y-Bias and Angularity:© The Dynamics of Self-Organizing Criticality From the Zero Point to Infinity by David G. Yurth and Donald Ayres: PDF-formatted versions in both 1 page per printout page format, and also 4 pages per printout page format: http://blog.lege.net/Nova_Institute_of_Technology_David_Yurth/Y-Bias_Monograph_Preview_Edition_25Apr06c.pdf http://blog.lege.net/Nova_Institute_of_Technology_David_Yurth/Y-Bias_Monograph_Preview_Edition_25Apr06c_4x.pdf Myself I got it as a Word-file at http://pureenergysystems.com/academy/papers/Y-Bias_and_Angularity/ Here I have written more, cut-pasted from another mail (9 January 2008): Actually, Dr. Prioré discovered the cure for cancer and other diseases already around 1967. He was so suppressed and rejected for this by the powers that be, that he soon thereafter died. This was in France. "A world-renowed parasitologist who did enormously important work with Prioré was Raymond Pautrizel" "Pautrizel was greatly persecuted for his years of determination and effort. Courtesy of Pautrizel via the late Christopher Bird, I personally have the very Ph.D. thesis that Prioré himself submitted to the University of Bordeaux on his revolutionary work." "More than a decade later a brave and determined Pautrizel finally was able to get a doctoral thesis approved in the Prioré work area, at the same university, by another doctoral candidate, Eric Perisse." (Thomas E. Bearden, Fer-de-Lance, p.146.) But in concensus reality, cancer is of course still not solved. While in thought-crime reality, any sickness could have been cured from 1967 or so and on. Any. And there can be no Resistant Strains to the new technology, since it works by reversing aging -- all aging -- so it actually makes the cells go to an earlier 'cell-age', when they were not sick, when the cancer was not there, when the HIV was not there, etc. And then they did an extra trick to strengthen the body so the sickness doesn't re-develop. Some of these principles are shown also in the presentation ''The "Porthole" Concept'' at http://cheniere.org/briefings/porthole/ by the writer Lt. Col Thomas E. Bearden (retd.) [PhD, MS (nuclear engineering), BS (mathematics - minor electronic engineering), Co-inventor - the 2002 Motionless Electromagnetic Generator - a replicated overunity EM generator]. Slide 53 to 60 on Prioré's method. There is a good text about Dr. Prioré's method also om pages 117 through 120 of David G. Yurth and Donald Ayres's "Y-Bias and Angularity:© The Dynamics of Self-Organizing Criticality From the Zero Point to Infinity" document, you can download it from http://PureEnergySystems.com/academy/papers/Y-Bias_and_Angularity Evidently someone tried to re-create some similar technology recently in San Diego, after he was himself cured of it. I received this on another forum: BEGIN QUOTE: Earlier this year a talked with someone in San Diego who told me an interesting story of how he cured his cancer. He had to go to Mexico to do it because anyone openly using this technology and teaching it to others gets kicked out of the country, or worse. It involved electricity and electro magnetism. He told me about how he brought back the schemata to build them for people. Within a couple weeks he has a lot of information, devices, computers, books etc. at his home. He came home one day and found everything taped off. The US Marshalls took everything. Every computer, every device, and every book...even books on meditation and spirituality oddly enough. I found this story very interesting, but only last week did I find out what he was talking about. Not only does this cure cancer, but HIV AIDS, Lupus, Hepatitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, bacterial infections, kills parasites...the list goes on and on. Listen to Dr. Beck explain this technology. From Google video: This is a rare video, taken in 1996 at Ventura College, of Dr Robert (Bob) Beck. A genius in the field of magnetism and electricity, he focused the last decade of his life on using micro currents to render all known virus, bacterial and parasites (including HIV!) powerless. This video seriously challenges current drug/chemical-fueled approach western science takes towards the treatment of disease http://www.sharinghealth.com/ http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=2095786730805958061 Here is part 1 of the Bob Beck protocol http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=3879823462993133294 http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-3494194760973110305 END QUOTE. Note that Dr. Beck's work is mentioned together with Dr. Prioré's by Bearden in ''The "Porthole" Concept'' and in the book "Fer-de-Lance". (Page 43 to page 49 in the book, and in the Porthole presentation slide 9 to 14 on Becker's method.) I suspect that this technology runs counter to the agenda in several respects, because it would nullify the negative health-effects of radiation, microwave (cell, mobile Internet), additives in the food, pollution, and many other stresses our bodies have been subject to. I don't think all this negative stress on our bodies are unintentional. And so technology to nullify it would naturally be suppressed. See f.ex. http://countercurrents.org/samples181207.htm "Culling The Herd" on the planned genocide in the United States. This technology could actually save millions and millions of Americans from their planned fate. No wonder the madmen want it suppressed. Another respect in which this technology runs counter to agenda is that it actually opens up people's minds for the possibilities of manipulating time itself, and eventually physical creation itself. And open Minds cannot be imprisoned in mental prisons... If anyone want to explore this science further, I suggest starting with the new physics involved, see my article "Crisis of Imagination" at http://blog.lege.net/content/crisis_of_imagination.html (You can even listen to it, my own voice: http://blog.lege.net/content/crisis_of_imagination.mp3 ) I also highly recommend the Y-Bias and Angularity paper, see http://pureenergysystems.com/academy/papers/Y-Bias_and_Angularity/ or http://blog.lege.net/cosmology/Y-Bias_Monograph_Preview_Edition_25Apr06c.pdf -- it really brings together the spirit stuff with the physical stuff. [Standard disclaimer: I am not a medical professional, so if anyones health status is improved by following my ideas, this must surely be because of 'spontaneous remission'.] Leif Erlingsson 2008-03-05 PDF "printout" |